Skip to main content

Why Should We Read Virgil’s Aeneid? An Animated Video Makes the Case

Maybe we take it for granted that Virgil’s Roman epic, the Aeneid, is a sequel—long delayed—of Homer’s Iliad, a classical adventure in verse, part legendary history, part fantasy, part myth. It is all these things, of course, but it also served some very specific purposes for its time, the imperial Rome of Augustus, Virgil’s patron, on whose insistence the Aeneid was published after the poet’s death. (Virgil himself wanted the manuscript burned.) The Aeneid was also political and religious propaganda.

Plato famously railed against Homer and other ancient poets for trivializing religion by turning the gods into vengeful, petty soap opera characters. Virgil and Augustus, on the other hand, explicitly hoped the Aeneid would effect “a revival of faith in the old-time religion,” as Clyde Pharr writes in the introduction to his Latin edition of the poem. “The educated Romans of the day were becoming quite blasé and sophisticated and were gradually losing the faith of their fathers with its simple, unquestioning reliance on the infallible wisdom of the gods and their helpful interference in human affairs.”

Roman religion was, however, not mysterious or remote but “intensely practical,” busying itself “with the everyday life of the people.” By this token, the faith Augustus wanted to promote was also intensely political, encouraging strict patriarchal hierarchies and a sense of sacred duty, the chief heroic burden Aeneus must bear—his pietas. Virgil wrote his hero, Mark Robinson argues in the animated TED-Ed video above, as a model for Augustus, who appears in the poem when Aeneus descends into the underworld and has a vision of the future of Rome.

Augustus is presented “as a victor entering Rome in triumph… expanding the Roman empire.” He is hailed as “only the third Roman leader in 700 years to shut the doors of the temple of Janus, signifying the arrival of permanent peace. But there’s a twist.” Augustus did not read to the end, and apparently did not notice Aeneus’s many flaws, dramatized, Robinson suggests, as a warning to the emperor, or his subjects.

In sections “that could be seen as critical, if not subtly subversive of the emperor’s achievements,” Aeneus struggles to “balance mercy and justice.” The hero arrives as a refugee from the conquered Troy, carrying his aging father on his back and leading his young son by the hand. He ends, proleptically, by founding the great empire to come. But as many scholars have argued, throughout the poem “Virgil undermined the sense of glorious progress, or even overturned it,” as Madeline Miller writes at Lapham’s Quarterly.

This modern reading of the Aeneid may be controversial, but the celebration of Augustus was embraced not only by the emperor himself but by ambitious rulers “as disparate as Elizabeth I, Louis XIV, and Benito Mussolini,” not to mention “the Founding Fathers, who generally preferred Homer.” Perhaps the poem’s endorsement by those in power and those positioned to flatter them has long colored the reception of the Aeneid as an uncritical celebration of empire.

The Aeneid is a foundational epic in the Western literary tradition because of Virgil’s undeniable poetic skill in adapting classical Greek forms into Latin, and because of its influence on hundreds of poets and writers for hundreds of years after. But perhaps, Robinson suggests, “in wanting the story published, Augustus had been fooled by his own desire for self-promotion.” Maybe the poem has also “survived to ask questions about the nature of power and authority ever since” it was first published, to instant acclaim, in 19 BC.

Related Content:

1,600-Year-Old Illuminated Manuscript of the Aeneid Digitized & Put Online by The Vatican

What Ancient Latin Sounded Like, And How We Know It

Rome Reborn: Take a Virtual Tour of Ancient Rome, Circa 320 C.E.

Josh Jones is a writer and musician based in Durham, NC. Follow him at @jdmagness

Why Should We Read Virgil’s Aeneid? An Animated Video Makes the Case is a post from: Open Culture. Follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Plus, or get our Daily Email. And don't miss our big collections of Free Online Courses, Free Online Movies, Free eBooksFree Audio Books, Free Foreign Language Lessons, and MOOCs.



from Open Culture https://ift.tt/2JYPC8U
via Ilumina

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Board Game Ideology — Pretty Much Pop: A Culture Podcast #108

https://podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/secure/partiallyexaminedlife/PMP_108_10-7-21.mp3 As board games are becoming increasingly popular with adults, we ask: What’s the relationship between a board game’s mechanics and its narrative? Does the “message” of a board game matter? Your host Mark Linsenmayer is joined by game designer Tommy Maranges , educator Michelle Parrinello-Cason , and ex-philosopher Al Baker to talk about re-skinning games, designing player experiences, play styles, game complexity, and more. Some of the games we mention include Puerto Rico, Monopoly, Settlers of Catan, Sorry, Munchkin, Sushi Go, Welcome To…, Codenames, Pandemic, Occam Horror, Terra Mystica, chess, Ticket to Ride, Splendor, Photosynthesis, Spirit Island, Escape from the Dark Castle, and Wingspan. Some articles that fed our discussion included: “ The Board Games That Ask You to Reenact Colonialism ” by Luke Winkie “ Board Games Are Getting Really, Really Popular ” by Darron Cu

How Led Zeppelin Stole Their Way to Fame and Fortune

When Bob Dylan released his 2001 album  Love and Theft , he lifted the title from a  book of the same name by Eric Lott , who studied 19th century American popular music’s musical thefts and contemptuous impersonations. The ambivalence in the title was there, too: musicians of all colors routinely and lovingly stole from each other while developing the jazz and blues traditions that grew into rock and roll. When British invasion bands introduced their version of the blues, it only seemed natural that they would continue the tradition, picking up riffs, licks, and lyrics where they found them, and getting a little slippery about the origins of songs. This was, after all, the music’s history. In truth, most UK blues rockers who picked up other people’s songs changed them completely or credited their authors when it came time to make records. This may not have been tradition but it was ethical business practice. Fans of Led Zeppelin, on the other hand, now listen to their music wi

Moral Philosophy on TV? Pretty Much Pop #32 Judges The Good Place

http://podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/partiallyexaminedlife/PMP_032_2-3-20.mp3 Mark Linsenmayer, Erica Spyres, and Brian Hirt discuss Michael Schur's NBC TV show . Is it good? (Yes, or we wouldn't be covering it?) Is it actually a sit-com? Does it effectively teach philosophy? What did having actual philosophers on the staff (after season one) contribute, and was that enough? We talk TV finales, the dramatic impact of the show's convoluted structure, the puzzle of heaven being death, and more. Here are a few articles to get you warmed up: "The Good Place’s Final Twist" by Karthryn VanArendonk "The Good Place Was a Metaphor All Along" by Sophie Gilbert "The Two Philosophers Who Cameoed in the Good Place Finale on What They Made of Its Ending" by Sam Adams "5 Moral Philosophy Concepts Featured on The Good Place" by Ellen Gutoskey If you like the show, you should also check out The Official Good Place Podca