Skip to main content

The Story Behind the Iconic Bass-Smashing Photo on the Clash’s London Calling

Pennie Smith was not a fan. Maybe that’s what made her the perfect photographer for The Clash. “She was never particularly into rock music,” writes Rob Walker at The Guardian; she wasn’t starstruck or overawed by her subjects; and she also wasn’t even particularly in love with the most famous shot of her career — the iconic photo of bassist Paul Simonon raising his Fender Precision at New York’s Palladium, seconds before smashing it to bits. “I said, ‘it’s completely out of focus,’” Smith remembers of the image when Joe Strummer insisted on using it for the cover of legendary double-LP London Calling. “But Joe wouldn’t have it. He said, ‘That one is the photo.’”

He was obviously correct, though Smith still doesn’t sound convinced. “I’m pleased I took it,” she says, “but it’s a bit of a weight around my neck. It keeps coming back to whack me on the back of the head — nicely in some instances, but aggravatingly in others.” Hitting one in the head — front or back — is the aim of the best album covers in punk, and “punk rock’s rage and dissent have always been easy to represent visually,” says Noah Lefevre in the Polyphonic video above. Taking the perfect punk photograph, however, depended on a number of variables all coming together perfectly for a once-in-a-lifetime shot.

For one thing, Smith had to have made the gig. She nearly accepted an offer to go out with friends instead. She also decided to change it up that night and stand on Simonon’s side of the stage instead of next to guitarist Mick Jones. And then, as Lefevre explains, there was the show itself. “In London, the Clash would play raucous punk bars and dancehalls full of standing room crowds. In the U.S.,” during their first tour in 1979, “they often found themselves playing in theaters with fixed seating.” The Palladium was such a venue. “Bouncers would hold crowds back, make sure they stayed stapled to their seats.”

The sedentary crowd killed the vibe. By the end of the show, “Paul’s frustration turned to anger,” notes Snap Galleries, “and then he lost it completely. His watch stopped at 9:50pm.” Smith remembers seeing him suddenly spin toward her. “He was in a really bad mood, and that wasn’t like him.” She was so startled, she got the photograph. “It wasn’t a choice to take the shot. My finger just went off.” That chance moment gave the band an ideal image for the London Calling cover.

It was illustrator Ray Lowry’s idea to crib the typography of Elvis’ first record, and the font “called back to the roots of punk rock,” born out of the ‘50s rockabilly tradition of simple songs and bare-bones instrumentation and arrangements. “Punk and rock and roll held the same cultural significance,” Lefevre says, but The Clash announced themselves on the album cover as purifiers of the tradition, stripping out the “phony Beatlemania” Strummer decried in the title track and replacing it with righteous, if barely-in-focus, rage. Hear the full gig just above, including the bass-smashing at the end at 1:08:10.

Related Content: 

Rare Live Footage Documents The Clash From Their Raw Debut to the Career-Defining London Calling (1977-1980)

“Stay Free: The Story of the Clash” Narrated by Public Enemy’s Chuck D: A New 8-Episode Podcast

The Clash Play Their Final Show (San Bernardino, 1983)

The Clash Live in Tokyo, 1982: Watch the Complete Concert

Josh Jones is a writer and musician based in Durham, NC. Follow him at @jdmagness

The Story Behind the Iconic Bass-Smashing Photo on the Clash’s London Calling is a post from: Open Culture. Follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Plus, or get our Daily Email. And don't miss our big collections of Free Online Courses, Free Online Movies, Free eBooksFree Audio Books, Free Foreign Language Lessons, and MOOCs.



from Open Culture https://ift.tt/3ctJzax
via Ilumina

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Board Game Ideology — Pretty Much Pop: A Culture Podcast #108

https://podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/secure/partiallyexaminedlife/PMP_108_10-7-21.mp3 As board games are becoming increasingly popular with adults, we ask: What’s the relationship between a board game’s mechanics and its narrative? Does the “message” of a board game matter? Your host Mark Linsenmayer is joined by game designer Tommy Maranges , educator Michelle Parrinello-Cason , and ex-philosopher Al Baker to talk about re-skinning games, designing player experiences, play styles, game complexity, and more. Some of the games we mention include Puerto Rico, Monopoly, Settlers of Catan, Sorry, Munchkin, Sushi Go, Welcome To…, Codenames, Pandemic, Occam Horror, Terra Mystica, chess, Ticket to Ride, Splendor, Photosynthesis, Spirit Island, Escape from the Dark Castle, and Wingspan. Some articles that fed our discussion included: “ The Board Games That Ask You to Reenact Colonialism ” by Luke Winkie “ Board Games Are Getting Really, Really Popular ” by Darron Cu

How Led Zeppelin Stole Their Way to Fame and Fortune

When Bob Dylan released his 2001 album  Love and Theft , he lifted the title from a  book of the same name by Eric Lott , who studied 19th century American popular music’s musical thefts and contemptuous impersonations. The ambivalence in the title was there, too: musicians of all colors routinely and lovingly stole from each other while developing the jazz and blues traditions that grew into rock and roll. When British invasion bands introduced their version of the blues, it only seemed natural that they would continue the tradition, picking up riffs, licks, and lyrics where they found them, and getting a little slippery about the origins of songs. This was, after all, the music’s history. In truth, most UK blues rockers who picked up other people’s songs changed them completely or credited their authors when it came time to make records. This may not have been tradition but it was ethical business practice. Fans of Led Zeppelin, on the other hand, now listen to their music wi

Moral Philosophy on TV? Pretty Much Pop #32 Judges The Good Place

http://podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/partiallyexaminedlife/PMP_032_2-3-20.mp3 Mark Linsenmayer, Erica Spyres, and Brian Hirt discuss Michael Schur's NBC TV show . Is it good? (Yes, or we wouldn't be covering it?) Is it actually a sit-com? Does it effectively teach philosophy? What did having actual philosophers on the staff (after season one) contribute, and was that enough? We talk TV finales, the dramatic impact of the show's convoluted structure, the puzzle of heaven being death, and more. Here are a few articles to get you warmed up: "The Good Place’s Final Twist" by Karthryn VanArendonk "The Good Place Was a Metaphor All Along" by Sophie Gilbert "The Two Philosophers Who Cameoed in the Good Place Finale on What They Made of Its Ending" by Sam Adams "5 Moral Philosophy Concepts Featured on The Good Place" by Ellen Gutoskey If you like the show, you should also check out The Official Good Place Podca