Skip to main content

The Strange, Spiritual Origins of the Ouija Board

Even as an avid horror movie fan, I find it hard to suspend disbelief when Ouija boards show up, and they show up often enough, in classics like The Exorcist and modern favorites like Paranormal Activity. Ouija boards have always seemed more like wands with plastic flowers in them than telegraphs to the afterlife or the infernal abyss. But I grew up with people who considered it a gateway to hell, just as spiritualists have considered it a portal to the beyond, where their dead relatives waited to give them messages.

So, how did this novelty item become such a potent figure of fear and fascination in America? When it was mass-marketed by “a Pittsburgh toy and novelty shop” in the late 19th century, as Linda Rodriquez McRobbie writes at Smithsonian, “this mysterious talking board was basically what’s sold in board game aisles today.” Its advertisements promised “never failing amusement and recreation for all the classes,” and a bridge “between the known and unknown, the material and immaterial.”

The Ouija board might have become a toy by the end of the century, but throughout the earlier decades, belief in the supernatural held serious sway among “all the classes.” The average lifespan was less than 50. “Women died in childbirth; children died of disease; and men died in war. Even Mary Todd Lincoln, wife of the venerable president, conducted séances in the White House after their 11-year-old son died of a fever in 1862.” Disease epidemics and the Civil War left millions bereft.

“Communicating with the dead was common,” says Ouija historian Robert Murch. “It wasn’t seen as bizarre or weird,” even among the staunchest religious people who filled the pews each Sunday. “It’s hard to imagine that now, we look at that and think, ‘Why are you opening the gates of hell?’” These commonly held beliefs may not have damned anyone’s soul, but they made even the rarest minds, like Sherlock Holmes’ creator Arthur Conan Doyle, susceptible to fraud and trickery.

It was only a matter of time before believers in spiritualism became a target demographic for the cheap commodities spreading across the country with the railroads. “People were desperate for methods of communication” with the dead “that would be quicker” than the local medium. “While several entrepreneurs realized that,” McRobbie writes, “it was the Kennard Novelty Company that really nailed it” with their 1886 product. But they didn’t invent it. Such devices date back years earlier.

Some early versions “looked like Ouija boards, and some didn’t,” notes Vox. “Some devices even used planchettes (that’s the name for the thing you hold when you operate a Ouija.” (Planchette, from medieval French, means a small board.) As for the nonsense word “Ouija,” one legend has it that the name came from an 1890 session in which the board was asked what it would like itself to be called. Learn more in the Vox video above about why the Ouija board came to loom so large, or in their words, became so “overrated,” in the American imagination.

Related Content:

Eerie 19th Century Photographs of Ghosts: See Images from the Long, Strange Tradition of “Spirit Photography”

Eerie 19th Century Photographs of Ghosts: See Images from the Long, Strange Tradition of “Spirit Photography”

Arthur Conan Doyle & The Cottingley Fairies: How Two Young Girls Fooled Sherlock Holmes’ Creator

Josh Jones is a writer and musician based in Durham, NC. Follow him at @jdmagness

The Strange, Spiritual Origins of the Ouija Board is a post from: Open Culture. Follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Plus, or get our Daily Email. And don't miss our big collections of Free Online Courses, Free Online Movies, Free eBooksFree Audio Books, Free Foreign Language Lessons, and MOOCs.



from Open Culture https://ift.tt/2t0AxyV
via Ilumina

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Board Game Ideology — Pretty Much Pop: A Culture Podcast #108

https://podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/secure/partiallyexaminedlife/PMP_108_10-7-21.mp3 As board games are becoming increasingly popular with adults, we ask: What’s the relationship between a board game’s mechanics and its narrative? Does the “message” of a board game matter? Your host Mark Linsenmayer is joined by game designer Tommy Maranges , educator Michelle Parrinello-Cason , and ex-philosopher Al Baker to talk about re-skinning games, designing player experiences, play styles, game complexity, and more. Some of the games we mention include Puerto Rico, Monopoly, Settlers of Catan, Sorry, Munchkin, Sushi Go, Welcome To…, Codenames, Pandemic, Occam Horror, Terra Mystica, chess, Ticket to Ride, Splendor, Photosynthesis, Spirit Island, Escape from the Dark Castle, and Wingspan. Some articles that fed our discussion included: “ The Board Games That Ask You to Reenact Colonialism ” by Luke Winkie “ Board Games Are Getting Really, Really Popular ” by Darron Cu

How Led Zeppelin Stole Their Way to Fame and Fortune

When Bob Dylan released his 2001 album  Love and Theft , he lifted the title from a  book of the same name by Eric Lott , who studied 19th century American popular music’s musical thefts and contemptuous impersonations. The ambivalence in the title was there, too: musicians of all colors routinely and lovingly stole from each other while developing the jazz and blues traditions that grew into rock and roll. When British invasion bands introduced their version of the blues, it only seemed natural that they would continue the tradition, picking up riffs, licks, and lyrics where they found them, and getting a little slippery about the origins of songs. This was, after all, the music’s history. In truth, most UK blues rockers who picked up other people’s songs changed them completely or credited their authors when it came time to make records. This may not have been tradition but it was ethical business practice. Fans of Led Zeppelin, on the other hand, now listen to their music wi

Moral Philosophy on TV? Pretty Much Pop #32 Judges The Good Place

http://podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/partiallyexaminedlife/PMP_032_2-3-20.mp3 Mark Linsenmayer, Erica Spyres, and Brian Hirt discuss Michael Schur's NBC TV show . Is it good? (Yes, or we wouldn't be covering it?) Is it actually a sit-com? Does it effectively teach philosophy? What did having actual philosophers on the staff (after season one) contribute, and was that enough? We talk TV finales, the dramatic impact of the show's convoluted structure, the puzzle of heaven being death, and more. Here are a few articles to get you warmed up: "The Good Place’s Final Twist" by Karthryn VanArendonk "The Good Place Was a Metaphor All Along" by Sophie Gilbert "The Two Philosophers Who Cameoed in the Good Place Finale on What They Made of Its Ending" by Sam Adams "5 Moral Philosophy Concepts Featured on The Good Place" by Ellen Gutoskey If you like the show, you should also check out The Official Good Place Podca