Skip to main content

How Music Unites Us All: Herbie Hancock & Kamasi Washington in Conversation

For the indefinite time being, we live with fear atop anxiety, anxiously looking for order in the past and in the future. But some people with newfound leisure in their coronavirus isolation have returned to what matters to them most here and now, and started to imagine a world no policy proposal can describe. The internet has given us greater and greater access to people who have been doing this all along. Even before the current pandemic, artists like Herbie Hancock and Kamasi Washington were expanding our notions of the possible in music and in life.

After leaving Miles Davis and going solo, Hancock was sometimes unfairly derided as a popularizer. In 1974, after his first gold record Head Hunters came out, critic Lee Underwood gave him the backhanded nickname “Mr. Communicate-With-A-Wider-Audience.” But as an early adopter of synthesizer technology, he was instrumental in keeping jazz in the spotlight throughout the 70s and integral to its influence on 80s pop. Likewise, Washington has been on the vanguard of a resurgent jazz as conversant with hip hop as it is with its forebears.

Part of a “bilingual generation,” as John Lewis writes at The Guardian, fluent in the old and new, Washington built cultural bridges as the musical director for Kendrick Lamar’s groundbreaking To Pimp a Butterfly. And both Hancock and Washington have worked with producer Flying Lotus, the grand-nephew of Alice Coltrane and grandson of singer-songwriter Marilyn McLeod. In their collaborations with other artists and their career-spanning world tours, they know their subject intimately when they talk about music as a uniting force, a fact we’ve all remarked on as people in infected areas emerge from windows to serenade their neighbors.

Maybe music is even more powerful than we allow in our communally joyful appreciation of Italian opera singers on balconies. Not only does it unite generations and genres, as Washington says in his short, animated conversation with Hancock above, it shuts down bigotry. When racists hear James Brown, he jokes, they become temporarily embarrassed out of their hate. (“I’ll go back to being a bigot when the song is over.”) Hancock replies that “music has a job to do,” and it’s to keep people together. How does it do this? Not only through mutual appreciation but also mutual creation.

“Music, and the arts in general,” says Hancock, can combine cultures, religions, and other differences uniquely such that “what comes out is something that neither one can take credit for. What comes out is a third thing. So it’s like one plus one equals three. That’s a new kind of math,” he says, and laughs. Hancock and Washington both draw from sources of spiritual wisdom that inform their music and broader views. Hancock’s Buddhist practice constitutes for him, he said in his Harvard Norton Lectures in 2014, a way of “being open to the myriad opportunities that are available on the other side of the fortress.”

Washington, whom The Fader hyperbolically calls “the wisest man on earth,” casually shared his philosophy of possibility in a recent interview. Transcending prejudice requires more than digging James Brown together. Maybe we need to readjust our whole perspective, he suggests:

I’m kind of a science-fiction guy and was thinking, “One day we’re going to travel to all these places and see the universe.” So there’s a side of myself that’s really infatuated with all the amazing things that I will do and the world can do — the idea of our endless potential. And the other side sees the struggle and is always problem-solving and poking holes, because I think of myself as being able to plug those holes. I imagine the world as a place of never-ending struggle because I have endless potential.

It's a quote that calls to mind the Bodhisattva’s vows. And what do we do? we might demand of this visionary vagueness. What do we do with the spectacles of gross negligence, corruption, and criminal mismanagement all around us? His answer involves acceptance as much as action.

We don’t live in the whole world so we have a whole lot of control — ultimate control — over our little pocket. The people who seem to have a lot of power don’t actually have a lot of power; someone like Trump only has the power people give him and at any point we can take that back.

We might imagine the larger conversation between Hancock and Washington, who began a tour together last year, elaborating on ways to act locally but think with limitless potential, to emerge from fortresses of prejudice and exercise collective power. We would do well to pay attention to artists now, especially those like Hancock and Washington who have been soundtracking the future for decades, and who seem to think that it still has a chance.

Related Content:

Herbie Hancock Presents the Prestigious Norton Lectures at Harvard University: Watch Online

John Coltrane Talks About the Sacred Meaning of Music in the Human Experience: Listen to One of His Final Interviews (1966)

The History of Spiritual Jazz: Hear a Transcendent 12-Hour Mix Featuring John Coltrane, Sun Ra, Herbie Hancock & More

Josh Jones is a writer and musician based in Durham, NC. Follow him at @jdmagness

How Music Unites Us All: Herbie Hancock & Kamasi Washington in Conversation is a post from: Open Culture. Follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Plus, or get our Daily Email. And don't miss our big collections of Free Online Courses, Free Online Movies, Free eBooksFree Audio Books, Free Foreign Language Lessons, and MOOCs.



from Open Culture https://ift.tt/2YRH78C
via Ilumina

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Board Game Ideology — Pretty Much Pop: A Culture Podcast #108

https://podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/secure/partiallyexaminedlife/PMP_108_10-7-21.mp3 As board games are becoming increasingly popular with adults, we ask: What’s the relationship between a board game’s mechanics and its narrative? Does the “message” of a board game matter? Your host Mark Linsenmayer is joined by game designer Tommy Maranges , educator Michelle Parrinello-Cason , and ex-philosopher Al Baker to talk about re-skinning games, designing player experiences, play styles, game complexity, and more. Some of the games we mention include Puerto Rico, Monopoly, Settlers of Catan, Sorry, Munchkin, Sushi Go, Welcome To…, Codenames, Pandemic, Occam Horror, Terra Mystica, chess, Ticket to Ride, Splendor, Photosynthesis, Spirit Island, Escape from the Dark Castle, and Wingspan. Some articles that fed our discussion included: “ The Board Games That Ask You to Reenact Colonialism ” by Luke Winkie “ Board Games Are Getting Really, Really Popular ” by Darron Cu

How Led Zeppelin Stole Their Way to Fame and Fortune

When Bob Dylan released his 2001 album  Love and Theft , he lifted the title from a  book of the same name by Eric Lott , who studied 19th century American popular music’s musical thefts and contemptuous impersonations. The ambivalence in the title was there, too: musicians of all colors routinely and lovingly stole from each other while developing the jazz and blues traditions that grew into rock and roll. When British invasion bands introduced their version of the blues, it only seemed natural that they would continue the tradition, picking up riffs, licks, and lyrics where they found them, and getting a little slippery about the origins of songs. This was, after all, the music’s history. In truth, most UK blues rockers who picked up other people’s songs changed them completely or credited their authors when it came time to make records. This may not have been tradition but it was ethical business practice. Fans of Led Zeppelin, on the other hand, now listen to their music wi

Moral Philosophy on TV? Pretty Much Pop #32 Judges The Good Place

http://podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/partiallyexaminedlife/PMP_032_2-3-20.mp3 Mark Linsenmayer, Erica Spyres, and Brian Hirt discuss Michael Schur's NBC TV show . Is it good? (Yes, or we wouldn't be covering it?) Is it actually a sit-com? Does it effectively teach philosophy? What did having actual philosophers on the staff (after season one) contribute, and was that enough? We talk TV finales, the dramatic impact of the show's convoluted structure, the puzzle of heaven being death, and more. Here are a few articles to get you warmed up: "The Good Place’s Final Twist" by Karthryn VanArendonk "The Good Place Was a Metaphor All Along" by Sophie Gilbert "The Two Philosophers Who Cameoed in the Good Place Finale on What They Made of Its Ending" by Sam Adams "5 Moral Philosophy Concepts Featured on The Good Place" by Ellen Gutoskey If you like the show, you should also check out The Official Good Place Podca